Two words: Rubber Duck. :)
Nov. 17th, 2002 12:33 amWent to the midnight showing of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets last night. I was going to write a detailed analysis of the film, but since
ashfae's written a great one, I'll just let her do it for me. *grins*
I absolutely agree with everything she says, but I'll just add a few of my own remarks:
1) Parseltongue is the SEXIEST language in the universe. Oh. My. GOD. *thud*
I swear I was tempted to become evil, just to sound that lustworthy. *lol*
2) I LOVE THE WEASLEYS!
Mr Weasley was as cute as can be, Percy with scruffy morning hair is too adorable, and although Ginny's crush was virtually dropped in the film, the moment she first sees him in the Burrow was perfect.
There needed to be more Weasley goodness! They should have cut a few minutes of the Basilisk chase to spend more time in the Burrow, or at least give my honeys Fred and George (you all know I'm in love with them, right? ;-) some much deserved screen time. Where oh WHERE was my favourite line in the whole damn series, 'Make way for the Heir of Slytherin! Seriously evil wizard coming through...' The twins are unfairly cut from the film once again, and I'm just not happy about it. Grrr. *pouts*
3) I no longer hate Jason Isaacs as Lucius Malfoy.
From the photographic evidence and the one or two lines in the trailers, I thought he would be horrible, but I confess I changed my mind completely on seeing his performance. He was elegant, pretentious, callous, insuffrably rude and truly evil. So anyone who dares to think I'm stubborn and refuse to change my opinions, I have proved thee wrong. ;-)
4) That damn sword.
This has been annoying me since I first saw the early pictures of the Chamber -- the sword that supposedly belonged to Godric Gryffindor is about the size of a toothpick. It's more like the bloody penknife of Gryffindor than a sword. It looks small in a child's hands, so how on earth could a great warrior use it?? I don't understand how they can get some details absolutely perfect (the Weasley's clock, the moving portraits, Ginny always carrying the diary, etc) and some so utterly, utterly wrong? Of course, this isn't nearly as bad as the two major, unforgiveable mistakes established in the first film: making Harry's parents WAY too old (they're in their early twenties, dammit!) and those god damn blue eyes. They're still SO distracting. Ugh.
5) Lockhart steals the show.
The film would have been nothing without the astoudingly brilliant performance of Kenneth Brannaugh as Lockhart. Wow. He obviously gloried in this over the top, camp creation, and played it up so well, without ever being ridiculous or cringe worthy. The best moment in the entire film for me was Lockhart grinning at a portrait of himself, who was painting a portrait of himself. Hilarious. I'm only sad he won't be back again to make me giggle in the next film. :)
I wish I had dressed up to see the film, it felt so normal and boring just going in my jeans and t-shirt. Ah well. I do want to dress up for The Two Towers, although I have no idea how I'm going to walk around barefoot in short trousers in the middle of winter. *laughs*
I absolutely agree with everything she says, but I'll just add a few of my own remarks:
1) Parseltongue is the SEXIEST language in the universe. Oh. My. GOD. *thud*
I swear I was tempted to become evil, just to sound that lustworthy. *lol*
2) I LOVE THE WEASLEYS!
Mr Weasley was as cute as can be, Percy with scruffy morning hair is too adorable, and although Ginny's crush was virtually dropped in the film, the moment she first sees him in the Burrow was perfect.
There needed to be more Weasley goodness! They should have cut a few minutes of the Basilisk chase to spend more time in the Burrow, or at least give my honeys Fred and George (you all know I'm in love with them, right? ;-) some much deserved screen time. Where oh WHERE was my favourite line in the whole damn series, 'Make way for the Heir of Slytherin! Seriously evil wizard coming through...' The twins are unfairly cut from the film once again, and I'm just not happy about it. Grrr. *pouts*
3) I no longer hate Jason Isaacs as Lucius Malfoy.
From the photographic evidence and the one or two lines in the trailers, I thought he would be horrible, but I confess I changed my mind completely on seeing his performance. He was elegant, pretentious, callous, insuffrably rude and truly evil. So anyone who dares to think I'm stubborn and refuse to change my opinions, I have proved thee wrong. ;-)
4) That damn sword.
This has been annoying me since I first saw the early pictures of the Chamber -- the sword that supposedly belonged to Godric Gryffindor is about the size of a toothpick. It's more like the bloody penknife of Gryffindor than a sword. It looks small in a child's hands, so how on earth could a great warrior use it?? I don't understand how they can get some details absolutely perfect (the Weasley's clock, the moving portraits, Ginny always carrying the diary, etc) and some so utterly, utterly wrong? Of course, this isn't nearly as bad as the two major, unforgiveable mistakes established in the first film: making Harry's parents WAY too old (they're in their early twenties, dammit!) and those god damn blue eyes. They're still SO distracting. Ugh.
5) Lockhart steals the show.
The film would have been nothing without the astoudingly brilliant performance of Kenneth Brannaugh as Lockhart. Wow. He obviously gloried in this over the top, camp creation, and played it up so well, without ever being ridiculous or cringe worthy. The best moment in the entire film for me was Lockhart grinning at a portrait of himself, who was painting a portrait of himself. Hilarious. I'm only sad he won't be back again to make me giggle in the next film. :)
I wish I had dressed up to see the film, it felt so normal and boring just going in my jeans and t-shirt. Ah well. I do want to dress up for The Two Towers, although I have no idea how I'm going to walk around barefoot in short trousers in the middle of winter. *laughs*
